Differentiation and Connection Between Planning Profiles and Worklists
Both
Planning Profiles and worklists offer the possibility to make a user-specific selection from the overall quantity of planning objects available in SEM-BPS. Both means have different goals, but with a sensible combination they can lead to a considerable reduction in the administrative effort:Therefore, planning profiles contribute to a simpler orientation in the planning environment, while worklists allocate an individual dataspace to the user within which he/she can plan.
Regarding the second of the named aspects (definition of a dataspace), there is a partial overlapping between the planning profile and the worklist, since through a selection of characteristic values, which you make in the context of a planning level or planning package, you also specify the dataspace within which can be planned. For this reason there are two alternative possibilities from the data administration view, to make a user-specific restriction of the dataspace:
The administrative effort for both scenarios for n users is as follows:
Activity |
Scenario 1 |
Scenario 2 |
Setting up planning (for example for cost center planning) |
n Profile |
1 Profile |
Adding characteristic value |
1 Package |
1 Variable value |
Adding characteristic and assigning values |
1 Level |
1 Level |
Adding package |
n Profile |
1 Profile |
Adding planning layout |
n Profile |
1 Profile |
The comparison shows:
All in all, there are considerable savings in the administrative effort when you decide in favor of the combined use of planning profiles and worklists.