Start of Content Area

Background documentation Differentiation and Connection Between Planning Profiles and Worklists

Both Planning Profiles and worklists offer the possibility to make a user-specific selection from the overall quantity of planning objects available in SEM-BPS. Both means have different goals, but with a sensible combination they can lead to a considerable reduction in the administrative effort:

Therefore, planning profiles contribute to a simpler orientation in the planning environment, while worklists allocate an individual dataspace to the user within which he/she can plan.

Regarding the second of the named aspects (definition of a dataspace), there is a partial overlapping between the planning profile and the worklist, since through a selection of characteristic values, which you make in the context of a planning level or planning package, you also specify the dataspace within which can be planned. For this reason there are two alternative possibilities from the data administration view, to make a user-specific restriction of the dataspace:

  1. Individual planning profile:
    You create an individual planning profile for every user, in which the planning area and the planning level are contained which are necessary for the execution of a certain planning task. In addition, you also create an individual planning package for every user, which contains the user-specific selection of characteristic values. Finally, you assign an individual planning profile to every user, in order to make the settings contained in it effective.
  2. Combined use of planning profiles and worklists:
    You create a standard planning profile for all users, who are involved in a certain planning task, and add the planning area and levels to it. In addition, you create a variable with the replacement type "User-specific values" for the characteristic, whose values describe the responsibility of different users (for example planning for various regions by different employees). Now you assign the respective affected value ranges to the variable per user, and add the variables as selection of the affected characteristic in the planning level. Finally, you assign the common planning profile to all users.

The administrative effort for both scenarios for n users is as follows:

Activity

Scenario 1
Creating/changing objects

Scenario 2
Creating/changing objects

Setting up planning (for example for cost center planning)

n Profile
n Package
0 Variable
0 Variable values

1 Profile
0 Package (Ad hoc package)
1 Variable
n Variable values

Adding characteristic value

1 Package

1 Variable value

Adding characteristic and assigning values

1 Level
n Package
0 Variable values

1 Level
0 Package (Ad hoc package)
n Variable values

Adding package

n Profile

1 Profile

Adding planning layout

n Profile

1 Profile

The comparison shows:

All in all, there are considerable savings in the administrative effort when you decide in favor of the combined use of planning profiles and worklists.