Entering content frameObject documentation Cycle Locate the document in its SAP Library structure

Definition

A cycle can comprise one or more segments

Caution

You can create up to 999 segments in a cycle.

Use

Theoretically, you can define a cycle for an entire controlling area.

For performance and allocation reasons, however, you can create several cycles, which you can process sequentially. This ensures that one cycle is processed before the next cycle is executed.

This division into cycles is advisable for many reasons:

Example

You have divided your allocations into four cycles. An error occurs in the third cycle. You can correct this error and repeat the allocation for this cycle. You only have to repeat the fourth cycle if it is dependent on the results of the third cycle.

This method is attractive to organizations with a large number of cost centers or business processes, where it is too time-consuming to process allocations in a single cycle. Dividing allocations into multiple cycles also allows you to allocate costs at different times.

Dependent Cycles

Cycles are said to be dependent, if a cycle uses the results from a previous cycle’s allocation. Therefore, you must execute dependent cycles in the correct order to ensure correct results.

Note the following requirements:

Dependent Segments

The sequence of the segments in a cycle has no effect on the cycle results.

The R/3 System uses two forms of segment execution:

(see Iterative Processing of Cycles)

Validity Periods for Cycles

Cycles are saved time-based. You must define a validity period for each cycle.

Example

You create the cycle VER10 for the period from 01/01/1997 until 31/05/1997 and from 01/06/1997 until 31/12/1997. The cycle exists in two validity periods.

When allocating costs, you can select a given validity period for the cycle. If you select the cycle starting on 01/01/1997, the R/3 System selects the first of the two cycles for processing.

Caution

The cycle you select must be valid for the posting period.

For example, you cannot allocate costs in the second half of a fiscal year for a cycle defined exclusively for the first half of the fiscal year. In the example above, this means that for the cycle VER10 of 01.01.1997 you could not allocate costs in period 08.1997.

 

 

Leaving content frame