Example: Derivation of List and Component Notification 
In the first step in determining the notification status, the composition tree is expanded completely to listed substance level.
See also:
Example: Determination of Listed SubstancesThe notification status n (notification negative) has a lower priority than notification status y. This means that component C has list notification n as a result.
This means that the notification status would be derived from the values in brackets if the values for the list notification were passed up in the hierarchy.
Step 2 Derivation of list notificaiton (Lis) and component notification (Com) |
Displaying the results as a list |
P |
Lis |
Kom |
Prop |
A |
Lis |
Kom |
Prop | ||||
ë |
A |
(n) |
y |
40% |
ë |
B' |
y |
44% | |||
ê |
ë |
C |
(n) |
50% |
ë |
B' |
y |
18% | |||
ê |
ê |
ë |
[C'] |
y |
60% |
ë |
C' |
y |
15% | ||
ê |
ê |
ë |
[C''] |
n |
1% |
ë |
C'' |
n |
0,25% | ||
ê |
ê |
ë |
y |
38% |
ë |
D |
e |
6% | |||
ê |
ë |
A' |
(e) |
50% |
ë |
Z |
y |
2 | |||
ê |
ë |
[B'] |
y |
85% |
ë |
H2O |
y |
14,5% | |||
ê |
ë |
[Z] |
y |
10% |
|||||||
ê |
ë |
[D] |
e |
5% |
|||||||
ë |
B |
(y) |
y |
45% |
|||||||
ê |
ë |
[B'] |
y |
60% |
|||||||
ê |
ë |
[B''] |
y |
40% |
|||||||
ë |
C |
(n) |
n |
5% |
|||||||
ê |
ë |
[C'] |
y |
60% |
|||||||
ê |
ë |
[C''] |
n |
1% |
|||||||
ê |
ë |
[H2O] |
y |
38% |
|||||||
ë |
[D] |
||||||||||
ë |
[H2O] |
For substance A, there is an obvious discrepancy between the list and component notification, that is, the notification status for substance A was changed by the appropriate person responsible (from n to y). This yields an overall default value for the list notification of
P Lis = min(y,n,y,y,y,,y,ye,y,n,y,e,y) = n and P Reg = min(y,y,n,e,y) = n for the component notification.