You use this function to compare and evaluate appraisals.
Note
You can only compare appraisals with each other if they were created with the same appraisal model, or if at least the first appraisal element (the one after the appraisal model) is the same in all cases. If appraisals are to be compared with each other, and the results are to be interpreted coherently, then the appraisals involved should contain as many of the same appraisals elements as possible. For further information on appraisal models, please refer to the Implementation Guide (IMG) for
Personnel Development
(step:
The actual comparison is performed at the appraisal element level - this gives you a clear overview of the appraisals created.
You can carry out the following reporting options (among others):
How different appraisers have rated a person. See Comparing Appraisals of the Same Appraisee Using Average Values: Example .
How different persons have been rated by an appraiser. See Comparing Appraisals by the Same Appraiser: Example .
If there were any variances in the ratings given to different persons. See Determining Variances: Example .
A range of editing and formatting functions are available for displaying your comparison results.
A comparison is always defined using a
reference appraisal.
The reference appraisal is the appraisal against which other appraisals are compared.
You can display the comparison in list or graphic form. Different functions are available in both these forms of display:
List display |
Graphic display |
In the comparison results, the rating defined in the reference appraisal is displayed in the first line of every appraisal element. Another option available is to take the
You can also specify whether the appraisal results should be displayed from the perspective of the appraisers or appraisees.
|
Here, you can use different chart types (2-D and 3-D) to display appraisal results. Further options are available for configuring each chart type. For more information on graphic options, please refer to. |
See also: