This function enables you to compare the qualifications and requirements of objects (persons, applicants, jobs, positions, and so on) against each other. The required and existing proficiency of each qualification is also taken into account. This means, for example, that you can compare an employee’s qualifications with the requirements of the position this employee holds to see how suited the employee is to this position. You can include an unlimited number of objects in a profile matchup.
Use this evaluation if you want to:
Find out how suitable one or more persons are for a position
Identify persons who are over-qualified or under-qualified
Identify suitable applicants for a vacancy
Identify appropriate training options for persons
Check the current level of qualification in an organizational unit
Check the need for training in an organizational unit
The following options are available for selecting the objects to be included in a profile matchup:
The objects to be included in the matchup are specified individually
The profile matchup is executed directly from the profile of a person/position for the position the person holds/person who holds the position
The profile matchup is executed for all persons in an organizational unit and the positions they currently hold (see Matching Up Positions With Their Holders for an Organizational Unit )
The following selection options are available:
Select objects whose qualifications are to be included in the profile matchup
Select objects whose requirements are to be included in the profile matchup
Restrict the selection to qualification deficits (in other words, the proficiency of the qualification held is lower than the proficiency required)
Determination of training proposals for qualification deficits (that is, development measures that impart the qualifications required) – in this case, you must also have implemented one of the following components:
Training and Event Management
or
Development Plans
.
Note
The training proposals displayed are development measures that “refresh” or improve the current proficiency of the qualification – in other words, the development measure imparts a proficiency that is greater than or equal to the proficiency required.
Key date for the evaluation
The settings you made with regard to essential requirements and depreciation meter values are taken into account in the evaluation (siehe User-Specific Settings ). Essential requirements and alternative qualifications are identified as such in the list.
Every requirement is compared with every existing qualification. The results are displayed in graphic form in a list.
Note
You can change the selection options for qualification deficits and training proposals.
From this list, you can switch to the following output formats:
Table Control List (display using ABAP List Viewer)
Note
Any additional qualifications that are not required are not displayed in this format.
SAP presentation graphics (for more information on graphic options, see Presentation Graphics ). The graphics can only be called up from one of the two list displays.
The Table Control List can contain any of the following fields:
Output Field |
Description |
Name |
Name of qualification |
Essential requirement |
Flag showing that this is an essential qualification |
Proficiency required |
Proficiency required for the qualification |
Existing Proficiency |
Proficiency that currently exists for the qualification |
Difference between scale proficiencies |
Difference between the proficiency required and the existing proficiency |
Training proposals |
An icon here means that training proposals have been generated |
|
|
Type |
Object type of the development measure |
Name of development measure |
|
Proficiency imparted |
Proficiency of the qualification imparted by the development measure |
Involvement in development measure |
Function for booking or planning participation in a training measure |
Name |
Essential requirement |
Proficiency required |
Existing Proficiency |
Difference between scale proficiencies |
English |
|
Fluent |
Fluent |
0 |
ABAP |
Very good |
Good |
-1 |
See also:
Performing a Profile Matchup (Starting Out From the Structural Display for an Organizational Unit)
Matching Up Positions with Their Holders for an Organizational Unit