Example: Settlement of Non-Apportionable Settlement Charge Key
Starting point (example)
A settlement unit has accumulated costs of 1000 euros on a non-apportionable service charge key; two contracts participate in the costs as follows:
Rental object 1 with an area of 100 sq. meters |
|
Contract 1.1 |
01/01/2002 – 04/30/2002 |
Vacancy |
05/01/2002 – 06/30/2002 |
Rental object 2 with an area of 100 sq. meters |
|
Contract 2.1 |
01/01/2002 – 06/30/2002 |
Service charge settlement result
In the settlement result, these contracts are marked with
NPA
(no participation).
The costs are distributed as follows:
Period |
Identification |
Result (euros) |
|
Contract 1.1 |
01/01/02-04/30/02 |
NPA |
331.49 |
Vacancy RU 1 |
05/01/02-06/30/02 |
VAC |
168.51 |
Contract 2.1 |
01/01/02-06/30/02 |
NPA |
500.00 |
The following postings are generated from the above:
Posting key |
Amount (euros) |
Account (text) |
Account assignment |
40 |
331.49 |
470510 (Contract settlement w/o further settlement) |
Contract 1.1 |
40 |
168.51 |
470520 (RU settlement) |
Rental object 1 |
40 |
500.00 |
470510 (Contract settlement w/o further settlement) |
Contract 2.1 |
50 |
1000.00 |
470499 (Credit apportionable operating costs) |
Settlement unit |
For the contracts in question, no credits/receivables are created for the apportionable service charge key; consequently no transfer posting of advance payments is made.