Determination of Comparison Period Using First Method if New change validation Attribute Is Not FlaggedThe Toolbox uses this variant if you
Have
not
flagged the
New change validation
attribute
in the interface format
Have
not
flagged the
Only original periods
export option for the export.
It is assumed that the third-party system has received the data from the retroactive accounting periods as well as from the original periods.
The specification of the precedent for the payroll period in change validation has been converted. For compatibility reasons, SAP supports this variant.
Disadvantages
If a payroll period is exported several times, changes are also transferred several times.
In certain situations, the Toolbox does not export retroactive changes.
In retroactive accounting for payroll, the preceding payroll periods are defined using the following rules:
Rule 1
For the first retroactive accounting period in payroll, the preceding period is the most recent payroll period in the in-period view that matches the current payroll period in the for-period view . If this payroll period does not exist, then the system does not call up a preceding period for the data comparison.
Rule 2
For the following retroactive accounting periods and the original period for payroll, the system always uses the preceding retroactive accounting periods.
These rules are described in an example.
Example
The payroll periods listed in the table are applicable for an employee.
Sequential no.
|
For-period
|
In-period
|
Preceding period |
Explanation
|
00001 |
01 2000 |
01 2000 |
none |
First export |
00002 |
02 2000 |
02 2000 |
00001 |
|
00003 |
03 2000 |
03 2000 |
00002 |
|
00004 |
04 2000 |
04 2000 |
00003 |
|
00005 |
02 2000 |
05 2000 |
00002 |
Preceding period according to rule 1 |
00006 |
03 2000 |
05 2000 |
00005 |
Preceding period according to rule 2 |
00007 |
04 2000 |
05 2000 |
00006 |
Preceding period according to rule 2 |
00008 |
05 2000 |
05 2000 |
00007 |
Preceding period according to rule 2 |