Travel Management and System Infrastructure
Possible System Combinations
R/3 Travel Management (TRV) can be used
- in combination with R/3 Human Resources (HR) and R/3 Accounting (AC)
- in combination with HR and separate from AC
- in combination with AC and separate from HR
- separate from HR and AC
Depending on the configuration Support Packages (SP) and HR Support Packages (HR SP) have to be imported into the respective systems.
Advantages/Disadvantages of Cases 1 - 4
Case 1: Travel Management, HR and Accounting are in one system
Advantages:
No need for distribution of:
- HR master data
- Travel expense results to Payroll
- CO receivers
.
- Validation of CO receivers is carried out locally
- Synchronous posting of travel expense results to Accounting
Disadvantages:
- Human Resources, Accounting and Travel Management have to have the same release status
- Lack of flexibility
- Possible capacity problems
Case 2: Travel Management and HR in a system separate from AC
Advantages:
No distribution of travel expense results for Payroll
Travel Management and Accounting can have a different release status
Existing accounting systems can be connected
Disadvantages:
- Remote validation of CO receivers in Accounting via ALE
- CO receivers have to be replicated in the Travel Management system to provide a correct input help for CO receivers
- To create person-related vendors automatically, the HR master data (Infotypes 0000, 0001, 0002, 0003, 0006, 0009, 0017, 0105) has to be replicated in the Accounting system via ALE.
- Asynchronous posting of travel expense results to Accounting via ALE. To guarantee a successful posting to the Accounting system in this case, the posting run has to be validated before it is sent.
Case 3: Travel Management and AC in a system separate from HR
Advantages:
- No
distribution of CO receivers is required
- CO receivers are validated locally
- Human Resources and Travel Management can have a different release status
- Synchronous posting of travel expense results to Accounting. In this case documents in a posting run containing errors can be rejected
Disadvantages:
- HR master data (Infotypes 0000, 0001, 0002, 0003, 0006, 0009, 0017, 0105) has to be replicated via ALE
- Travel expense results for Payroll have to be replicated via ALE
- Both the Support Packages and the HR Support Packages have to be imported into the Travel Management/Accounting systems.
Case 4: Travel Management, AC and HR are in separate systems
Advantages:
Human Resources, Travel Management and Accounting can all have a different release status
Maximum flexibility
Existing Accounting and HR systems can be connected
Disadvantages:
- HR master data (infotypes 0000, 0001, 0002, 0003, 0006, 0009, 0017, 0105) has to be replicated in the Travel Management system via ALE
- To create person-related vendor master records in Accounting automatically, the HR master data (infotypes 0000, 0001, 0002, 0003, 0006, 0009, 0017, 0105) has to be replicated in the Accounting system via ALE.
- Travel expense results for Payroll have to be replicated via ALE
- Remote validation of CO receivers
- CO receivers have to be replicated in the Travel Management system to provide a correct input help for CO receivers
- Asynchronous posting of travel expense results to Accounting via ALE. To guarantee a successful posting to the Accounting system in this case, the posting run has to be validated before it is sent.
See also:
Criteria for Selecting a System Infrastructure
Transfer to Accounting
Transfer to HR PayrollFor more information on setting up ALE scenarios, see, for example, the implementation guide (IMG) for Basis under Application Link Enabling (ALE) ® Modeling and Implementing Business Processes
® Predefined ALE Business Processes
®
- Human Resources ® HR <-> HR
® Set Distribution of Trip Accounting Results
- Human Resources ® HR <-> AC
® Set up Trip Costs Transfer
- Human Resources ® HR <-> AC
® Set Up Integration of Travel Management and Funds Management